Suzuki Burgman USA Forum banner

Darksiding Considerations...

15K views 137 replies 37 participants last post by  rustynail  
#1 ·
..you may not have taken into account...

This is probably one of the best short discussions regarding tires and motorcycles I've seen, and no doubt needs to be taken into consideration, though unless you've taken physics and done vector analysis, it may "mean" very little, though the effects discussed cannot be discounted, ignored, or explained-away....

Tires

Tires have a large influence over bike handling, especially on motorcycles. Tire inflation pressures have also been found to be important variables in the behavior of a motorcycle at high speeds. Because the front and rear tires can have different slip angles due to weight distribution, tire properties, etc., bikes can experience understeer or oversteer. Of the two, understeer, in which the front wheel slides more than the rear wheel, is more dangerous since front wheel steering is critical for maintaining balance.[7] Also, because real tires have a finite contact patch with the road surface that can generate a scrub torque, and when in a turn, can experience some side slipping as they roll, they can generate torques about an axis normal to the plane of the contact patch.


Image


(Bike tire contact patch during a right-hand turn)

One torque generated by tires is due to asymmetries in the side-slip along the length of the contact patch. The resultant force of this side-slip occurs behind the geometric center of the contact patch, a distance described as the pneumatic trail, and so creates a torque on the tire. Since the direction of the side-slip is towards the outside of the turn, the force on the tire is towards the center of the turn. Therefore, this torque tends to turn the front wheel in the direction of the side-slip, away from the direction of the turn, and therefore tends to increase the radius of the turn.

Another torque is produced by the finite width of the contact patch and the lean of the tire in a turn. The portion of the contact patch towards the outside of the turn is actually moving rearward, with respect to the wheel's hub, faster than the rest of the contact patch, because of its greater radius from the hub. By the same reasoning, the inner portion is moving rearward more slowly. So the outer and inner portions of the contact patch slip on the pavement in opposite directions, generating a torque that tends to turn the front wheel in the direction of the turn, and therefore tends to decrease the turn radius.

The combination of these two opposite torques creates a resulting yaw torque on the front wheel, and its direction is a function of the side-slip angle of the tire, the angle between the actual path of the tire and the direction it is pointing, and the camber angle of the tire (the angle that the tire leans from the vertical). The result of this torque is often the suppression of the inversion speed predicted by rigid wheel models described above in the section on steady-state turning.

High side:

A highsider, highside, or high side is a type of bike motion which is caused by a rear wheel gaining traction when it is not facing in the direction of travel, usually after slipping sideways in a curve. This can occur under heavy braking, acceleration, a varying road surface, or suspension activation, especially due to interaction with the drivetrain. It can take the form of a single slip-then-flip or a series of violent oscillations...." When the slipping rear tire suddenly regains traction it is not moving in the same plane as the rest of the bike. This causes the motorcycle to straighten up so quickly the rider is almost always thrown off, even at low speed.

Technical explanation:

Forces occurring between the motorcycle and the road (such as accelerating, decelerating and turning) are transmitted by friction occurring at the contact patch. There is a limited amount of force that the contact patch can transmit before the tire begins to lose traction, and therefore slide/ skid.

When going through a curve on a motorcycle, centripetal force (added to the other lateral forces such as acceleration or deceleration) is transferred from the road to the motorcycle through the contact patch, and is directed at a right angle to the path of travel. Applying too much throttle during the curve (or taking a curve too fast) would increase the centripetal force, thereby increasing the total net force through the contact patch. If the net force is greater than the static friction coefficient of the tire multiplied by the normal force of the motorcycle through the tire, the tire will skid outwards from the direction of the curve. By locking a tire during a curve using the brakes, the friction giving the tire its traction would be overcome by the previous forces discussed.

Once a tire slips in a curve, it will move outwards under the motorcycle and cause the motorcycle to lay down in the direction the rider is already leaning to counteract the moment applied by the centripetal force and lead to a lowsider.

If the tire regains traction after the rider starts to skid while the motorcycle is moving sideways, the tire will stop its sideways movement causing the motorcycle to suddenly jerk into an upright position (and beyond). This movement can easily cause the rider to be thrown off.

The name derives from the side of the motorcycle that the rider will separate from. If forcibly thrown over the bike, the rider is said to have dismounted on the high side.

The "highsider" has the additional disadvantage of the rider often being catapulted into the air by the sudden jerking motion of the motorbike and the increased possibility of the motorbike sliding behind the rider, threatening to crush them.

Because "highsider" accidents are so much more deadly than low-side accidents, the Motorcycle Safety Foundation recommends that if a rider locks the rear brake at higher speeds and the traction is good the brake should not be released.[1]

(and of course, our Burgmans could/would never experience such a situation with a car tire installed on the rear.... :wink: )

Would somebody who is inexperienced (or even 'experienced' riders), happy with their CT on the rear know this? Again, with our Burgs, it probably is not that big of an issue, however, all things considered, it MUST be considered for that possible ONE time that you could experience 'loss of traction' of that 'fat' CT on the rear....you'd better know how to react...

:cheers:

I posted this because several times this past week, while riding my bicycle along the road here, at the same time, I tend to see the same cars and motorcycles traveling down the road (both directions)...I've seen a couple of 'fat' tire choppers, you know, the ones with the real fat tires...and I wondered, if the tire is that PHAT, then why not put a car tire on the back (after all, it doesn't get leaned that FAR over for the sidewall to be an issue, like a CT on a Burgman)...well, in watching the choppers operate, I've seen them take turns and corners and that fat tire, a motorcycle tire, DOES roll quite well and when they lean, there is a very noticable 'sidewall' area up the tire that the tire rolls onto....so I started looking at the traction, slippage, "roll curves", slip angles....etc... anyways, this post probably won't be very 'popular' but whether or not you've darksided, the physics are the physics and CTs and MC tires are very different beasts. Ultimately I don't care what tire is on whose bike (I do care on MY bike, though), and this is just more food for thought.
 
#2 ·
Your primary error is using science to explain the dangers of Darksiding. :blackeye:

Most Darksiders prefer to live in the Dark Ages, where scientific explanations were a sin against God.
If it's round, and fits (sort of), then it must be OK.

Your scientific explanation would also justify 99.9% of knowledgeable experts opinions to never mix a bias ply tire with a radial.

As for me, I will only use matched tires on my motorcycles, as I have been for the last 40+ years.

That might have some bearing as to why I haven't ever been in a motorcycle accident. :wink:
 
#3 ·
Ah, but missing part of the logic of a car tire. It has more traction than a motorcycle tire, therefor will never slip, therefor impossible to highside due to loss o traction on the rear wheel while in a turn :D :blackeye:
 
#4 ·
And the fact that car tires on the back of motorcycles have proven to be at least as safe as motorcycle tires in practice and to offer definite advantages to those who use them should not outweigh the fact that in theory they aren't supposed to work and could under exceptional conditions pose a hypothetical hazard.
Anyway, that's not what my Grandpappy had.

8) Claude
 
#5 ·
I love BUSA, but this darkside stuff is getting tedious. Really. Every day (when the weather is nice) I see guys on Harleys, other cruisers, and crotch rockets dressed in tee shirts, jeans, and sandals, and of course, no helmets. Which do you think is more dangerous? Auto tires or no safety gear at all?

But you know what? I don't care. People know that if they get killed it will cause pain and possibly hardship for their family and friends. They can make their own decisions, I'm not going insist that the entire world should do what I do and don't do what I don't do.

If you think it is OK to force others to meet your personally approved safety standards consider this; motorcycles riders are 4 times more likely to be killed or badly injured than cagers, and scooter riders 2 times more likely than "real" bikers. One of my friends is the county medical examiner. Among other duties he gets called to the scenes of all vehicular fatalities. If he could have his way all motorcycles and scooters would be outlawed.

Now, for myself, I just put a brand new set of Bridgestones on my Burgman. These tires were designed in cooperation with Suzuki specifically for the Burgman 650. That's all I need to know, and I won't buy anything else.

When I ride to work I rarely achieve 25MPH, never mind going faster. 3/4 helmet with shield, armored jacket, gloves, dress pants, black hiking boots. If I'm going to go faster, full helmet and all the rest of the gear. I know the risks and I've set my own risk tolerance level. If your risk tolerance level is lower than mine, whine all you want. I don't care.
 
#6 ·
My ears were ringing. :twisted:
 
#7 ·
I have to agree with Bigfoot on this one. I have a Bachelor of Science degree and have worked in my field 22 years. Before that I was a building contractor for 13 years. Although my expertise is not in motorcycles or tires, I've put 10s of thousands of miles on motorcycles, and I know what I like. But the article quoted by QuantumRift is a little technical for my liking. I appreciate his desire to educate others on the darksiding issues, and if you are considering the darkside, please do a lot of research before you decide. I am now darksided and have been in the past as well, and like Bigfoot, I have never had an accident on a motorcycle.

I also agree with Greenheron, If you ride on two wheels, you should take all the safety precautions necessary to be as safe as possible. But I don't get the following statement, "if you think it is OK to force others to meet your personally approved safety standards consider this; motorcycles riders are 4 times more likely to be killed or badly injured than cagers, and scooter riders 2 times more likely than "real" bikers." I am actually a "real biker" (not a Hell's Angel) because I have had and ridden many "real bikes" over the years. In fact, my scooter is a real bike. But according to the statement above, us scooterists are 8x more likely to be killed or seriously injured than a cager. I find most scooter riders are conserned with safety and ride so. But that's just my observation. Eugene W
 
#8 ·
Eugene,

In my state (RI) anything 49cc or less is a scooter (so a moped is a scooter here), anything more than 49cc is a "real" motorcycle, registered as such and requiring a motorcycle endorsement on the driver's license. In neighboring Massachusetts anything 49cc or less does not require a license plate and is exempt from the mandatory insurance law. Also, ordinary driver's license. More than that and it becomes a motorcycle.

I think the difference in the injury/fatality statistics can be accounted for by the lack of safety education and the lack of a motorcycle license, which translates to a lack of need to demonstrate (or posses) any sort of riding proficiency.

Alan
 
#9 ·
Alan, Thanks for clearing that up for me. Eugene W
 
#10 ·
I too have many 10,000's of miles on motorcycles and HAVE had two accedents on them. BOTH accedents were on Motorcycle Tires, NOT CAR TIRES! I think that back in Oct 09, IF I was on my Burgman with the car tire, I would have stopped much quicker and not hit that car. The Goldwing weighs about 70 more pounds than my Burgman. I locked up the rear brake as that rear MC Tire is a 130/90 17 and its foot print is very narrow, compaired to the 165/65 SR 14 Car Tire on the Burgman that I can not lock up easy.
 
#11 ·
there is a pretty tight curve by my house that I usually take about 50-mph... If I hit it just right I
can take it about 53-54-mph... my question is Would I be able to take the curve at 50-53mph
on a car tire, in relative safety, like I can on my stock motorcycle tires...? (my Burg is an '07 650)

See, I don't want to try a car tire (just for mileage) if I can't 'push it' in the twisties...

anyone,

w
 
#12 ·
greenheron said:
.

Now, for myself, I just put a brand new set of Bridgestones on my Burgman. These tires were designed in cooperation with Suzuki specifically for the Burgman 650. That's all I need to know, and I won't buy anything else.

.
AMEN ! ! ! :thumbup:
 
#13 ·
Dave_J said:
I too have many 10,000's of miles on motorcycles and HAVE had two accedents on them. BOTH accedents were on Motorcycle Tires, NOT CAR TIRES! I think that back in Oct 09, IF I was on my Burgman with the car tire, I would have stopped much quicker and not hit that car. The Goldwing weighs about 70 more pounds than my Burgman. I locked up the rear brake as that rear MC Tire is a 130/90 17 and its foot print is very narrow, compaired to the 165/65 SR 14 Car Tire on the Burgman that I can not lock up easy.
I guess then that makes car tires dangerous. :thumbup:

On the level and flat, I have NO doubt whatsoever that an automobile can 'outperform' a motorcycle tire for traction and stopping ability.

However if you'd locked up that rear tire on the GW in lean or emergency situation, you'd probably be wishing you had a restraint device to keep you on the seat when it grabbed up again....

Having said that, though, physics is physics and given a circumstance where a motorcycle is leaned far enough to keep the front tire's contact patch constant, and CT that get's it's patch lifted and is riding up on the sidewall, the physics is different, the forces on the tires are different, the lateral forces are different, the tire flex is different, and well, the traction is absolutely and unequivocally different - and the response of each tire to the situation is different. As I said, if you want technical explanations as to why they are different other than just saying "I do it and I've never had a problem", I just provided it. Yes, it may be a bit more technical than most people want or need to know but it is what it is.

For purposes of discussion, those who don't wear helmets and safety gear are not part of or relative to the discussion. I already told you I don't care what tires you have, whether or not you wear helmets or gear....it's just another bit of 'information' for those who are unfamiliar with the whole concept.

:thumbup:
 
#14 ·
wish137 said:
there is a pretty tight curve by my house that I usually take about 50-mph... If I hit it just right I
can take it about 53-54-mph... my question is Would I be able to take the curve at 50-53mph
on a car tire, in relative safety, like I can on my stock motorcycle tires...? (my Burg is an '07 650)

See, I don't want to try a car tire (just for mileage) if I can't 'push it' in the twisties...

anyone,
I would never encourage anyone to push their motorcycle to it's limits. That said, I am able to do anything with my scooter darksided that I was able to do before. It needed to be broke in and gotten used to just like any new tire. Eugene W
 
#15 ·
QuantumRift said:
Dave_J said:
I too have many 10,000's of miles on motorcycles and HAVE had two accedents on them. BOTH accedents were on Motorcycle Tires, NOT CAR TIRES! I think that back in Oct 09, IF I was on my Burgman with the car tire, I would have stopped much quicker and not hit that car. The Goldwing weighs about 70 more pounds than my Burgman. I locked up the rear brake as that rear MC Tire is a 130/90 17 and its foot print is very narrow, compaired to the 165/65 SR 14 Car Tire on the Burgman that I can not lock up easy.
I guess then that makes car tires dangerous. :thumbup:

On the level and flat, I have NO doubt whatsoever that an automobile can 'outperform' a motorcycle tire for traction and stopping ability.

However if you'd locked up that rear tire on the GW in lean or emergency situation, you'd probably be wishing you had a restraint device to keep you on the seat when it grabbed up again....

Having said that, though, physics is physics and given a circumstance where a motorcycle is leaned far enough to keep the front tire's contact patch constant, and CT that get's it's patch lifted and is riding up on the sidewall, the physics is different, the forces on the tires are different, the lateral forces are different, the tire flex is different, and well, the traction is absolutely and unequivocally different - and the response of each tire to the situation is different. As I said, if you want technical explanations as to why they are different other than just saying "I do it and I've never had a problem", I just provided it. Yes, it may be a bit more technical than most people want or need to know but it is what it is.

For purposes of discussion, those who don't wear helmets and safety gear are not part of or relative to the discussion. I already told you I don't care what tires you have, whether or not you wear helmets or gear....it's just another bit of 'information' for those who are unfamiliar with the whole concept.

:thumbup:
Actually that would make motorcycle tires dangerous if we went by Dave's experiences. As far as physics go, QuantumRift makes some good points. But I'm not sure how they affect a car tire's performance on a motorcycle. Since I've done it both ways I know how it affected MY motorcycle/scooter's performance. But that is just me. And it is impossible as stated in other threads to lean a motorcycle far enough to actually put it on it's side walls. Side wall flex may affect performance but it will not lean onto the side wall. Check out "darkside" on youtube and watch some of the videos. I found them informational, some found them scary. But they are interesting at the least. If you decide to darkside do it after carefull and extensive research and come to your own opinion. Do not take mine or for that matter anyone's, pro or con. Eugene W
 
#16 ·
The point I was making is any tire on a motorcycle could be DANGEROUS in one condition and not in another. I have had to grab a handfull of rear brake in a corner with the Car Tire on the back, when the front valve stem broke at 60 MPH. All it did was stand the bike upright and I could stop on the sholder. But if that rear tire had slipped, BANG, down I would have gone in Miliseconds.

But these posts are really GREAT and I look forward to putting my part into them. Some think that they are TEDIOUS and not needed, but they are more wrong than the Naysayers that are only looking out for our safety. Any information, PRO or CON is good information. The only bad info is total disregard or closed mindedness. The post that just Mihna Birds what others said without true Butt time testing is usefull but not to as great as true "Seat of the Britches" testing data.

We all know Cyanid is poisenous becouse there has been many reports that it will kill you. These reports are from "Seat of the Britches" type testing.

Then theres reports that a curtin activity when over done would grow hair on the palms of your hand, DID IT? :D
 
#17 ·
MarilynsPrince said:
QuantumRift said:
[...I guess then that makes car tires dangerous. :thumbup:

On the level and flat, I have NO doubt whatsoever that an automobile can 'outperform' a motorcycle tire for traction and stopping ability.



Actually that would make motorcycle tires dangerous if we went by Dave's experiences. As far as physics go, QuantumRift makes some good points. But I'm not sure how they affect a car tire's performance on a motorcycle. Since I've done it both ways I know how it affected MY motorcycle/scooter's performance. But that is just me. And it is impossible as stated in other threads to lean a motorcycle far enough to actually put it on it's side walls. Side wall flex may affect performance but it will not lean onto the side wall. Check out "darkside" on youtube and watch some of the videos. I found them informational, some found them scary. But they are interesting at the least. If you decide to darkside do it after carefull and extensive research and come to your own opinion. Do not take mine or for that matter anyone's, pro or con. Eugene W
yea that was a typo on my part. I was thinking MC tire and Car tire came out and I didn't proof it that good, so point taken... :oops:
 
#18 ·
QuantumRift, I knew what you meant. Just having fun :eek: Actually, the safest motorcycle doesn't have any tires. But then it would just sit someplace and not be ridden, or wrecked, or enjoyed for that matter. But these discussions are great because everyone can put in there two cents worth and an intelligent person can sift through all the nonsense to find their own truth, whatever it is for them. I wouldn't want anyone to take my say so anymore than I would take theirs without more information. Eugene W
 
#19 ·
Well, I ascribe to Murphy's Law: "If anything can go wrong it will."

and do not forget QuantumRift's corollary: "And when it does go wrong, it will go wrong at the WORST possible moment."


QuantumRift's quantum physics revision of Murphy's Law: "Everything goes wrong all at once."

and remember:

Nature always sides with the hidden flaw
Corollary: The hidden flaw never stays hidden for long.

Just when you think things cannot get any worse, they will.
 
#20 ·
My brother always said that "Murphy was an optimist!" But you say it much more eloquently. Eugene W
 
#21 ·
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the first Harley Davidsons were sold with BICYCLE tires.

Image


1901 William S. Harley, age 21, completes a blueprint drawing of an engine designed to fit into a bicycle.
1903 William S. Harley and Arthur Davidson make available to the public the first production Harley-Davidson® motorcycle. The bike was built to be a racer, with a 3-1/8 inch bore and 3-1/2 inch stroke.
 
#22 ·
Yea I see several "motorized" bicycles around here....49cc is the limit for no license requirement and I've seen a couple of homebuilt "motor"bikes as well as a couple of commercial kits. You can also get just about any bicycle electrified now..all with bicycle tires. :thumbup:
 
#23 ·
I couldn't help jumping in here. As a longtime darksider on the goldwing I will tell you that a car tire, especially a run flat, on the back of a motorcycle is much safer and more stable than a motorcycle tire. If you have not ridden on a car tire there is nothing you can offer in this discussion other than opinion. I have ridden thousands of miles on a car tire and love it! The car tire carries more weight, will not go flat if it's a run flat, and corners better than a motorcycle tire. If I can find a car tire for the burgman I will switch over when this one wears out. As an expert by experience I would say, "Don't knock it until you try it."
 
#25 ·
mjmesserli said:
...... a car tire, especially a run flat, on the back of a motorcycle is much safer and more stable than a motorcycle tire..... and corners better than a motorcycle tire....
OK, darksiding may have benefits.... but to say that they are universally "better" is foolish. If they were better in all the aspects you list, they would be OEM on every bike.

Here's why people darkside..... time/money. That's it. If M/C tires:
A) Cost the same (or less)
B) Lasted as many (or more) miles
..... nobody would be darksiding. Nobody.
 
#26 ·
mjmesserli said:
I couldn't help jumping in here. As a longtime darksider on the goldwing I will tell you that a car tire, especially a run flat, on the back of a motorcycle is much safer and more stable than a motorcycle tire. If you have not ridden on a car tire there is nothing you can offer in this discussion other than opinion. I have ridden thousands of miles on a car tire and love it! The car tire carries more weight, will not go flat if it's a run flat, and corners better than a motorcycle tire. If I can find a car tire for the burgman I will switch over when this one wears out. As an expert by experience I would say, "Don't knock it until you try it."
Mjmesserli, you can not win in these Darkside posts. You post the facts as you have seen from seat of the britches testing and the Naysayers will dig up posts from people that have never tried it but are "EXPERTS". It matters NOT even if you had over 1,000,000 miles on Darkside tires, The Naysayers KNOW your wrong, foolish, a cheapskate,.... They got thier heads in a box and can not see out of it. I think outside of the box in most things of life.

PM me if you want Darkside info for a Burgman. I will never try to talk anyone into Darksiding and have talked a few out of doing it.