Suzuki Burgman USA Forum banner

Cleaning Air Filter

9.6K views 27 replies 13 participants last post by  jenkins  
#1 ·
Has anyone attempted cleaning the air filter by soaking in a solution of dish detergent and water, then washing in kitchen dishwasher appliance?
What was the result?
Did heat damage the plastic?
 
#2 ·
#3 ·
Maybe, With Clothes in the washer, at the same time :lol: But the Plastic Agitator may break it. and the stock filter will shed to peaces and Sog into Toilet paper.. :lol:

Gary,
 
#4 ·
I've used TechArtGuy's process for the last 35,000 miles at least and it works great. I have two filters. One is installed, and the other then can be cleaned and set aside to dry.

Chris
 
#5 ·
While Chris, you have two of them.. Good thinking. :thumbup:

Gary,
 
#6 ·
putting air filter in clodthes washer is a great way to turn t shirts into cleaning rags, :evil: tears the shirts all up then gets the fibers in the filter and makes you say bad words in front of the neighbors kids and then they say them to their mom and

just don't do it
 
#7 ·
Do you clean your car filters or change them? How often? They're the same type paper. Personally I wouldnt but can give you no factual reason other than I don't think the clogged pores of the paper can be cleaned and that its likely to drive the microscopic dirt particles into the pores.

Before I found out that K&N filters were so porous, which is why they can claim your engine breaths much better, I did the cut and paste and made one. Having spent about $50 doing this, I'll keep using it. With hindsight, i'd spend the money for an OEM.
 
#8 ·
Had The K&N installed for years ted clement, Your SAFE! I say 2 years old now still Cleaning, The stock filter was not made for cleaning just made to be Replaced over and over again, And sheds, Would not reccomend cleaning it becuze Lint will get into the engine and Damage Cylinder, I have found no evidence of the K&N particles Getting thru even when we had those fires in the Montains Not a particle of Ash got thru, One reason why i made my own instead of drop Waisted Cash,

Gary,
 
#11 ·
ted clement said:
Do you clean your car filters or change them? How often? They're the same type paper. Personally I wouldnt but can give you no factual reason other than I don't think the clogged pores of the paper can be cleaned and that its likely to drive the microscopic dirt particles into the pores.

Before I found out that K&N filters were so porous, which is why they can claim your engine breaths much better, I did the cut and paste and made one. Having spent about $50 doing this, I'll keep using it. With hindsight, i'd spend the money for an OEM.
You won't go wrong with the OEM filter for sure. As for reusables:

I have a K&N filter in a 1990 Isuzu 2.6L 4x4 that has 186,000+ miles on it. It's had a K&N filter since I could first find one for it. The engine's cylinder walls still exhibit cross hatching (inspection revealed this when I had to change a head several years ago that had warped and could not be planed any futher).

I have a 2006 Hyundai Sonata with just about 60K miles on it, and the first thing I did after I bought it was stop by the auto parts store and get a K&N filter.

We have a 2004 GMC Envoy that's had a K&N filter in it since day one.

We have a 1993 Olds Delta 88 that has a K&N filter in it as well.

None of these vehicles has had ANY problems with air filtration or any problems caused by the air filter.

As for K&N:

...http://cars.about.com/b/2006/05/18/can- ... nd-out.htm

Scroll down and read in particular Dave Vespremi's contribution to the discussion...

You don't buy a K&N or BMC filter (by itself) for performance improvements. You do not buy it for better mpg. You buy it, because in the long run, you can clean and reuse the thing over and over and over with no ill-effects. At $40+ now, the OEM filter is very costly for my 650, so if I'm going to CLEAN and reuse a filter, I get one that is MADE TO clean and reuse. I paid about 60 for my BMC (because K&N doesn't have one yet for the 650) and I live in AZ where it's particularly dusty. That means that instead of replacing my filter yearly or twice yearly, I can clean it and reuse it.

No K&N filter voids any manufacturer warranty. There is NO proof whatsoever anywhere that a K&N filter caused an engine failure or premature wear. I've seen and read lots of 'word of mouth' urban legend things, but no real, documented proof.

The only thing I ever 'cleaned and reused' a paper filter on is my 16 gallon Craftsman shop-vac. And even at that (since I use it regularly to clean the cars and to vacuum the garage), after one or two "good cleanings" with soap and water, the paper starts turning crappy, gets stiff and eventually non-porous (yes the paper degrades). You're just better off to take the paper filter and vacuum out the debris with a powerful vac as well. Use the shop vac itself (unfiltered) to pull the debris back out of the dirty side....LoL...I've tired it all.....

Paper air filters have a weave in them which catches and retains dust, you cannot get all the dust out by simply dipping them in water and then running
a tap over them - it doesn't work because the filter is designed to retain the particulate matter it traps. The only way to get all the dust out is to destroy the weave in the paper. As part of the washing process you'll also end up with fibers that are stuck together, trapping dust inside the filter and reducing it's capacity when compared to a 'new filter'.

I mean, if you're going to the trouble of cleaning and reusing that air filter, just take it one more small step and flush out that dirty OIL filter and reuse it too. Makes sense to me. :?

It's amusing that folks first go out and spend the $$$ on a Burgman..then sink a lot of money into accessories and gear, and use costlier synthetic oil and good oil filters, but want to scrimp on air filters of all things.

That's like driving a BMW or Mercedes, eating at fine restaurants, wearing only the best clothes, and having the coolest electronics in your home, but buying your underwear at the 2nd hand store. :lol: Yikes.

If you don't like the cost of paper replacements are are just not 'sure' of reusables, then there is an alternative: The Nano Fiber filter media!

"The synthetic Nano Fiber solves all the issues of pleated paper and oiled gauze filter media's. It has un-believable particle efficiency: 100% efficiency at only 2 microns, catching particles in that critical 5 to 20 micron range.

Nano Fiber air filters are 3 to 5 times more efficient than the best-pleated paper filters and 50 times more efficient than oiled gauze! Its Nano Fiber material also flows air like an oiled open gauze media, even when heavily loaded with contaminants for great dirt holding capacity.

Nano Fiber air filters also have the advantage that they can be cleaned and re-used several times just like the oiled gauze filter. The difference being that the Nano Fiber air filter does not require the expense of a special cleaning and re-oiling kit. The synthetic Nano Fiber has a non-stick like surface. The filter can be vacuumed off or blown off with low-pressure compressed air and used over with no messy cleaning needed."

I like that idea - so where can we get one at what cost?? Where else... AMSOIL! Though I'm not sure one is available for the 650. I sent them a message asking about it.
 
#12 ·
It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words. So I'll post two pictures and let them speak for themselves. ;)
[attachment=1:17e96z3e]P1020317 (Medium).JPG[/attachment:17e96z3e]


This filter has been washed at least three times, maybe more. The only thing I can see that has deteriorated is some very fine fibers on the upper surface that are the thickness of a hair. Those fibers are like that only on the surface, not down in between the folds in the paper. The rest of the material looks as good as a new filter.

The test of the cleanliness of a filter is whether I can see light through it. The picture below is a little poor, but I think you can see on the folds that lined up with the camera lens and the light behind it that it is indeed clean all the way through.
[attachment=0:17e96z3e]P1020316 (Medium).JPG[/attachment:17e96z3e]

If all I did was to run it under tap water, I think there would be every opportunity to have the filter worse off in the end. By soaking the filter in a grease cutting soapy solution for hours, and periodically taking a brush to clean off the grease that is loosened...and then rinsing it thoroughly and letting it dry for a couple days, I think you end up with as clean a filter as if you took a piece of foam and did the same thing...and then oiled it.

Chris
 

Attachments

#13 ·
I’ve used a technique for “dry cleaning” the air filter that seems to have worked great for me. After removing the filter, I just give it a good spraying down with engine starting fluid. All the oily gunk washes right off and it returns to a clean appearance. Then I let it air dry for about an hour. The starting fluid evaporates very quickly because of its volatility.
 
#14 ·
aFe makes an air filter cleaning kit.

I use it on my diesel truck and on my burgy. I get about 6 burgy cleanings out of the disolver solution in the kit. I generally spray the burgy air filter, let it sit, wash it off, let it dry, spray it again in a few days, let it sit, wash it off, let it sit and dry (2 complete cycles). I catch all the wash water so I can see what was washed off and how clean the wash water is. On the second wash the wash water is very clean or I would do it a third time until the wash water is clean.

Bob Weis
 
#15 ·
Might as well add my technique. Soaked it thoroughly with Simple Green, let it set for a couple minutes, gently swiped any buildup hairs/particles off the outer edges of the filter with a toothbrush, flushed it out good with the faucet, repeated the process, shook out as much of the water as I could, hooked up a hair dryer on low to one end of a plastic bag and the other end to the filter using rubber bands, left a small hole for the air to partially escape, left it running for about 1/2 hr. This warmed it up and evaporated the moisture quickly. Installed and it is working great! Took a 15 mile ride this afternoon. :cheers: Jim
 
#16 ·
I like the hair dryer idea, thanks!

Bob Weis
 
#18 ·
Yeah! looks like K&N finally made one for are scooters , took a hell of a long time but K&N done it :thumbup:

Looks all most like my Custom made K&N :lol:

$55 dollors is a little high thoe at the most it should have been $35 Dollors sounds like a fair price.

and one thing thats ODD the Rubber Tube Thingy is not Show on there Installation Instruction Sheet hhmmm.

And there are No PINS for the snorkle Tube.....

So it's not needed any more what gives.....

Does this mean i can remove mines

Gary,
 
#19 ·
Yeah, thats true. Interesting.
There is no rubber "knee" -> maybe because of amount of intake air.

Is there any differences (fuel consumption, performace etc.) between original air filter and K&N for you? Or it's the same (but K&N is officially "washable")?
 
#20 ·
Yeah!! it runs better with it. then the Stock Air Robbing Filter.

I guess there's no need for my K&N page now so will Delete it?

Gary,
 
#21 ·
The K&N air filter looked to be $55. The OEM filter at Boulevard Suzuki was $39.12.

While the OEM filter isn't supposed to be cleanable, it is, as many of us have found.

Wouldn't the fuel injection system, in conjunction with the oxygen sensor have a tendency to balance the fuel/air mixture to the same point, no matter what I had in as a filter...even to the point of having no filter at all?

So why do I want to ditch the OEM filter? :?

Chris
 
#22 ·
Who could blame you at that Price $55 man what a rip off!

that's more then 40 Stock Air Filters :lol:

From what i read Chris, something about Rejeting with the $55 K&N filter im :? my self

And why was the 2 PIN Snorkle dumped! :?

No thanks i think i will stick with my Custom made one.

Gary,
 
#24 ·
Why does the snorkle decrease in cross sectional area? Anyone know?

Bob Weis
 
#25 ·
Well, the Problem is that the Intake is not a High Intake Pull, And the Stock Box is to Big and Only half the airbox is used on Operation, it's Not very Stable So that's Why the Snorkle was Added on there So the intake Area Pulls air in the Corner, Im gonna Put back on the Snorkle But gonna Cut it Down some, The intake is on the Other side when it should have been closes to the Intake Pull Left side One of the resons why the Snorkle was added was to pull more air on the Left side Corner.. Closes to the Engines Throttle Body intake, You may have Notice when you go inside to Look at it All the Dirt is on the Left side Corners and not on the Right side Corners.

Gary,
 
#26 ·
As the filter begins to fill on the left side would not the cleaner right side begin to provide more air if the air were not directed to the left side? Path of least resistance would use more of the total filter without the snorkel. I agree that I have seen the left side with more debris on it.

Where are you going to cut down the snorkel?

Bob Weis