No I meant 0-60. That was my count with a gps. Could be off a second on either. I just wanted to put out my results as a comparison between the two. Has anyone taken a stop watch to the two?No way a 400 is going to do a quarter mile in 11 seconds. Or a 650 in 6 seconds for that matter.
How much difference is there climbing onto the interstates etc??
650 much faster. But the 400 has more than enough. I have tested the 0-62mph time (that tends to be the figure everyone wants over here in urop! Mine managed 8.4 seconds with 2000 miles on the clock, but 7.9 seconds with 6000 miles showing. Those are speedo times filmed. The method was to film the speedo and then count with stop watch afterwards. Not the most accurate but gives a fair indication. The bike is completely standard, no sliders etc. I can hit the ramp going on at 30mph but be doing 70mph or more to join the traffic without any problem at all.How much difference is there climbing onto the interstates etc??
How do you read out 62 on an analog scale?650 much faster. But the 400 has more than enough. I have tested the 0-62mph time (that tends to be the figure everyone wants over here in urop! Mine managed 8.4 seconds with 2000 miles on the clock, but 7.9 seconds with 6000 miles showing. Those are speedo times filmed. The method was to film the speedo and then count with stop watch afterwards. Not the most accurate but gives a fair indication. The bike is completely standard, no sliders etc. I can hit the ramp going on at 30mph but be doing 70mph or more to join the traffic without any problem at all.